Sandra Hüller

Peter Simonischek

Michael Wittenborn

Thomas Loibl

Trystan Pütter

Ingrid Bisu

Hadewych Minis

Lucy Russell

Victoria Cociaș

Alexandru Papadopol

Victoria Malektorovych

Ingrid Burkhard

Jürg Löw

Ruth Reinecke

Nicolas Wackerbarth

Mihai Manolache

Radu Bânzaru

Niels Bormann

Radu Dumitrache

Klara Höfels

Hartmut Stanke

Hans Löw

Julischka Eichel

Lennart Moho

Irene Rindje

Sava Lolov

John Keogh

Cezara Dafinescu

Ozana Oancea

Manuela Ciucur

Ursula Renneke

Karlheinz Ade

Mugur Sabo

Manu Sabo

Claudiu Împăratu

Bryan Jardine

Dana Marineci

Cătălin Băicuș

Marius Georgian

Miriam Rizea

Luana Stoica

Valentin Popescu

Ioan Brancu

Emil Constantinescu

Mădălina Ciotea

Daniel Filipescu

Raluca David

Mihai Răzuș

Adrian Bucur

Andrei Mateiu

Florin Vișenescu

Șerban Gabriel Cismărescu

Marcus Weber

Ebba

Vlad Ivanov

Cosmin Pădureanu

Maren Ade

Heike Parplies

Patrick Orth

Jonas Dornbach

Janine Jackowski

David Keitsch

Michel Merkt

Sebastian Schipper

Ada Solomon

Antonin Svoboda

Ben von Dobeneck

Bruno Wagner

Viorica Capdefier

Nina Haun

Silke Fischer

Mălina Ionescu

Katja Schlömer

Gitti Fuchs

Laura Einmahl

Ole Nicolaisen

Monika Münnich

Wiltrud Derschmidt

Patrick Veigel

Stephan Rother

Bernhard Maisch

Fabian Schmidt

Ulrich Herrmann

Andrea Hanke

Georg Steinert

Comedy

Drama

Toni Erdmann

Komplizen Film

Missing Link Films

Coop99 Filmproduktion

HiFilm Productions

MonkeyBoy

Austria

France

Germany

Romania

Reno

**What do you think is worth living for?**

I had tough time to figure it out what was the thing on the poster. Seeing it upside down, with mirror, name it, I used all the tricks I know, but nothing had worked. On the other hand, I thought it might be a fantasy film with a King Kong like creature. That's the curiosity it created, people to a have different opinions and forget to expect from the film. But it was a simple comedy-drama and only way to solve the mystery is to watch the film. That's what I finally did.

The opening scene was good. But I did not think the whole film would be like that. It was about a prankster and his attempts to reach his workaholic daughter, which was the entire narration. A lifetime trip for them, that's not about the challenges in the world or the nature, but their self-discovery, the meaning of life and purpose. This is one of the beautiful films to open up about a father and daughter relationship. In the grown-up world, the people forget to live the actual life, when they give all the focus to their professional life.

I have to agree, this is a competitive world and you will be replaced by millions of other waiting behind you for such opportunity. But does it all worth doing is the real question. Doubts like that won't arise without those who love us pointing it out. It needs to be asked properly, politely. But some people take an alternate route like in this film. Sometimes it ends in an unexpected adventure to just realise what they are into. And this film was honest, to reveal as much as it can in many angles.

This is the story of Winfried. An aged and divorced music teacher who makes practical jokes to people around him. After his dog died, he decides to reconnect with his only daughter Ines, who is now working in Romania. She is on the cusp to get her desired position in the office. On her one final push for that, is now getting distracted by her father. She who never understood her father's way of life, tries to get an answer out of him about the life. So that's where their journey begins. Some of the bold steps taken by them, the film accomplishes what it wanted to tell us in a unique way.

> "The problem is it's so often about getting things done. You do this, You do that. And in the meantime, life just passes by."

The film was actually loosely based by the director's own father. The writing was brilliant. It reminded me 'Infinitely Polar Bear', because these women directors inspired by their fathers to show the world how their childhood was like. The actors were amazing, particularly those two in the main roles. I liked them both equally. From the different angle, they have given different performances. There's no surprise if you liked the film only because of them.

The film had won many prestigious awards around the globe and now its biggest stand off is at the 2017 Oscars which is a few weeks away. Another Scandinavian film, which is also nominated for the Oscar, is also about an old man like this one. But I think 'Under Sandet' is the frontrunner for the golden statue. Because we all know that America's and Academy's sentimental towards the WWII.

When it comes to rating, the film is strictly for adults. It was good in the initial parts, but there are some surprise nude and sex scenes. At that time I thought it lost its path, but actually that was the turning point where you are going to witness a different half of the film. Surely many people going love the second half more than the first.

At first, it looked like it is a German version of 'The Family Fang', but only more realistic with dark humour. It's difficult to understand every scene, especially in the first watch. Because without knowing the film characters, the events involving them look casual. Capable to get the sense of humour is the key here. So if you decide for the second time viewing, you will learn more about it. It is one of those films that second time watch necessary for some people.

Frankly, I did not think it was a great film, just after finish my watch. But thinking back about all those film events, made sense. By the time I decided to write this review, I was in its favour. That's the reason I won't write about the films right away. This is a great film, but you have to focus closely and understand everything, then you will have a great time. But remember, it is one of the longest film in the recent time, particularly for a comedy-drama, yet enjoyable. Recommended!

_7/10_

CinemaSerf

Hmmm. I think it may be a testament to the skill of Peter Simonischek here that I didn't like this film very much, but in any case - I didn't. His daughter "Ines" (Sandra Hüller) had made a decent life for herself in the corporate world and the two have become largely estranged. He decides to try and rectify this by travelling to Bucharest where she is working with boss/lover "Gerald" (Thomas Loibl). He fancies himself as a bit of a practical joker, does "Winfried" but his attempts at humour merely irritate his daughter as they embarrass her and poke fun at the nature - sometimes the quite ruthless nature - of her work. This is just putting even greater strain on their relationship so dad comes up with an even more far-fetch solution. He invents the eponymous character who purports to be their boss's "life coach". Donning an ill-fitting suit and the most unconvincing of wigs, he proceeds to trample across her working life. She has two options - and she decides that fighting back is her best and what now ensues sees the pair spat and spar towards a denouement that I felt entirely predictable. There's no doubt that Simonischek's portrayal does get under your finger nails, but it's all just a bit too preposterous for me. He's the diametric opposite of her - his eccentricities and foibles contrasting so starkly with her career-minded focus that it all just came across as overly and sometimes quite cringe-makingly contrived. For some reason, she spends a fair chunk of the latter stages of the film naked whilst he's in gorilla suit. Surreal? Yes - but what's the point? It isn't funny and for her character to have achieved half of what she is portrayed to have done here, she'd have shown him the door (or a police car) ages earlier in the proceedings. Sometimes you have to be on the right wavelength to appreciate something quite this eclectic - but I wasn't on auteur Maren Ade's for this. It does show that Hüller has many strings to her bow, though - there's little she can't turn her hand to and this is just about worth watching to see that skill in action.