Dave Johns

Hayley Squires

Briana Shann

Dylan McKiernan

Kate Rutter

Sharon Percy

Kema Sikazwe

Magpie Richens

Amanda Payne

Chris McGlade

Shaun Prendergast

Gavin Webster

Sammy T. Dobson

Mickey Hutton

Colin Coombs

David Murray

Stephen Clegg

Andy Kidd

Kay Gilchrist-Ward

Dan Li

Jane Birch

Kimberley Blair Smith

Junior Atilassi

John Sumner

Dave Turner

Jackie Robinson

Kathleen Germain

Christine Wood

Micky McGregor

Neil Stuart Morton

Roy McCartney

Stephen Halliday

Julie Nicholson

Viktoria Kay

Malcolm Shields

Bryn Jones

Helen Dixon

Gary Jacques

Mick Laffey

Patricia Roberts

Yvonne Maher

Susan Robinson

Mike Milligan

Laura Jane Barnes-Martin

Harriet Ghost

Brian Scurr

James Hepworth

Natalie Ann Jamieson

Rob Kirtley

Ken Loach

Robbie Ryan

Jonathan Morris

Philippe Logie

Eimhear McMahon

Rebecca O'Brien

Paul Laverty

Kahleen Crawford

Fergus Clegg

Linda Wilson

Jo Slater

Caroline Barton

Dominic Byles

John Condron

Benjamin James Davis

Ray Beckett

Robert Brazier

Andrew Caller

Michael Clayton

Adam Scrivener

John Skehill

Neal Skillen

Dries Houben

Matt Fisher

Simon Magee

Ellen Pickering

Caroline Stewart

Alison Carter

Courtney Moore

Heather Storr

George Fenton

Ben Brazier

Gareth Spensley

François Tiberghien

Rowena Wilkinson

Sue Harding

David Gilchrist

Pascal Caucheteux

Grégoire Sorlat

Vincent Maraval

Courtney Jones

Lucy Marr

Chris Bevan

Patrick Jones

Emily Tillman

Jamie Hamer

Henry Jay Gordon

La' Toyah McDonald

Joss Barratt

Martin Butterworth

Andrew O'Reilly

Joachim Philippe

Léo Lefèvre

Mark Gales

Dave Gales

Aaron Blackburn

James Goodwin

Drama

I, Daniel Blake

Sixteen Films

Why Not Productions

Wild Bunch

BBC Film

Les Films du Fleuve

France 2 Cinéma

United Kingdom

France

Belgium

Reno

**A reminder that the society is made up of all kinds of people and some of them need gentle assistance.**

There was an Oscar buzz for this. Many film experts thought it would sail through, but that did not happen. Now I saw it and I think it should have made into. If the priests' dirty secrets were recognised to condemn on such a big platform, then this film deserves as well. Because it reveals the cruelty against the economically weaker families and computer illiterate old men.

It is only this much short to be called a documentary film. I mean it was very realistic with cinematic dialogues, otherwise a documentary. This is a message film, highlights what's wrong with our system and who are all suffering from it. The actors were great and the 80 years- old director had done a magnificent job. You could watch as many films you want, but if you fail to watch a film like this often, there no meaning getting into film watching business.

The story follows a 60 year old widower whose name mentioned in the title. As he is recovering from heart attack and as advise given by his doctor, now he's out of the job and support allowance. Whenever he approaches the officials to look his issue, they always come up with different reasons to send him back disappointing. Especially not being into the computers, he struggles to fill forms on the internet platform.

He's very patience and following everything they have told him to do. One day he comes to aid to a single mother with two kids who recently moved to the city from London, when she is too struggling in the employment agency to get a job. So their relationship grows as they lend hands to one another in tough times. Following, how they recover from the issues they are facing is what the film to cover in the remaining parts.

> "Listen, you know, you give me a plot of land, I can build you a house. But I've never been anywhere near a computer."

I liked this the film, but I think it was too realistic for my kind of taste. Because I like emotional parts and in this film those parts were highly effective, but not sentimentally striking way. Maybe you can say, less music with more dramatisation changed the storytelling style. Though the focus given on economically lower class and their way of life, not intentionally, but lack of support in society, all these were well detailed. I have always supported films that point outs flaws in basic establishment in society.

Almost all the major struggling juncture one goes through in the employment agency, particularly if the person was old is uncovered. Like the telephone calls responding to the recorded message, online applications, as well as meeting them in person. What we're facing right now in the world is or to know is, not everybody is a computer literate. It'll be in the future, but not now. They are not getting proper help, particularly agency treating them like the illegal immigrants.

In addition the film gets more interesting when a single mother was introduced. On the other side, different issues faced by poverty ridden small family, particularly her desperate attempt to fulfill the basic needs of her children is heartbreaking. This is not just the English problem, but everywhere else in the world. It had won several awards, particularly one BAFTA award. A good film for everyone, only if you understand the notion of the film or else will be a boring film.

While I was watching it, I thought it was a regular kind drama, so I kept expecting that things would turn this and that way. For almost the entire film, but it's only in the final stage something it came up with to surprise me. So my advice is keep low expectation and be patience. More importantly accept what it reveals than what you want from it. If you fail on that, then its not your film and to know that the only way is to watch it.

_7½/10_